- Region
- Águilas
- Alhama de Murcia
- Jumilla
- Lorca
- Los Alcázares
- Mazarrón
- San Javier
-
ALL AREAS & TOWNS
- AREAS
- SOUTH WEST
- MAR MENOR
- MURCIA CITY & CENTRAL
- NORTH & NORTH WEST
- TOWNS
- Abanilla
- Abarán
- Aguilas
- Alamillo
- Alcantarilla
- Aledo
- Alhama de Murcia
- Archena
- Balsicas
- Blanca
- Bolnuevo
- Bullas
- Cañadas del Romero
- Cabo de Palos
- Calasparra
- Camping Bolnuevo
- Campo De Ricote
- Camposol
- Canada De La Lena
- Caravaca de la Cruz
- Cartagena
- Cehegin
- Ceuti
- Cieza
- Condado de Alhama
- Corvera
- Costa Cálida
- Cuevas De Almanzora
- Cuevas de Reyllo
- El Carmoli
- El Mojon
- El Molino (Puerto Lumbreras)
- El Pareton / Cantareros
- El Raso
- El Valle Golf Resort
- Fortuna
- Fuente Alamo
- Hacienda del Alamo Golf Resort
- Hacienda Riquelme Golf Resort
- Isla Plana
- Islas Menores & Mar de Cristal
- Jumilla
- La Azohia
- La Charca
- La Manga Club
- La Manga del Mar Menor
- La Pinilla
- La Puebla
- La Torre
- La Torre Golf Resort
- La Unión
- Las Palas
- Las Ramblas
- Las Ramblas Golf
- Las Torres de Cotillas
- Leiva
- Librilla
- Lo Pagan
- Lo Santiago
- Lorca
- Lorquí
- Los Alcázares
- Los Balcones
- Los Belones
- Los Canovas
- Los Nietos
- Los Perez (Tallante)
- Los Urrutias
- Los Ventorrillos
- Mar De Cristal
- Mar Menor
- Mar Menor Golf Resort
- Mazarrón
- Mazarrón Country Club
- Molina de Segura
- Moratalla
- Mula
- Murcia City
- Murcia Property
- Pareton
- Peraleja Golf Resort
- Perin
- Pilar de la Horadada
- Pinar de Campoverde
- Pinoso
- Playa Honda
- Playa Honda / Playa Paraíso
- Pliego
- Portmán
- Pozo Estrecho
- Puerto de Mazarrón
- Puerto Lumbreras
- Puntas De Calnegre
- Region of Murcia
- Ricote
- Roda Golf Resort
- Roldan
- Roldan and Lo Ferro
- San Javier
- San Pedro del Pinatar
- Santiago de la Ribera
- Sierra Espuña
- Sucina
- Tallante
- Terrazas de la Torre Golf Resort
- Torre Pacheco
- Totana
- What's On Weekly Bulletin
- Yecla
- EDITIONS: Spanish News Today Alicante Today Andalucia Today
article_detail
Date Published: 31/05/2018
Definitive conclusions of the Report by the REGIONAL ASSEMBLY of MURCIA on CAMPOSOL.
This is a translated copy of the report produced by the regional parliamentary investigation into the history of the problems on the Camposol Urbanisation in the Mazarrón municipality
This report is the fruit of a two year investigation undertaken by a mixed party parliamentary commission to try and ascertain the sequence of events during the construction phase of the Camposol Urbanisation within the Mazarrón municipality.
The commission has no legal power to bring charges against any one body and seeks only to clarify the sequence of events and identify the root of the infrastructural problems which are still unresolved on the urbanisation, principally the construction of properties illegally over an infilled water rambla.
All enquiries about specific streets/poligonos should be directed to the Camposol Residents association, the CRA, via www.camposolresidents.es
Following the presentation of the report below, the public prosecutor decided to open its own judicial investigation into the sequence of events and investigate criminal culpability of the bodies concerned.
Latest news relating to the Camposol Urbanisation is posted in the Camposol section of the Murcia Today website and on the CRA website.
Report produced by the regional parliamentary commission in full:
INTRODUCTION
Camposol is the name of an urbanization which in the Plan Parcial (Partial draft Plan) is known as El Saladillo Sector A and B, C, D and F of the PGOU (Plan General de Ordenación Urbana - General Urban Plan) of Mazarrón. Throughout this report we will focus on the PP (Plan Parcial) corresponding to Sector A and B, C, D and F, affected by the negligent performance of the promoter Justo and Manolí, SL and the Administration (Town Hall). In this report we will discuss the aspects of all sectors, but principally Sector B.C.D and F.
This Sector has approximately 3,740 homes and some 5,000 residents.
The situation by Sector, according to written information provided by the CRA to the Commission of Territorial Policy of the Regional Assembly of Murcia, is as follows:
a) 234 properties in Sectors C14/15/16 and D29/32/35 have serious structural and infrastructure problems, visible from the exterior.
b) 550+ dwellings in Sector D were illegally constructed in the riverbed and the area of affection of the Rambla de Los Aznares. Many of these homes suffered severe damage during the September 2014 floods.
c) 585 Houses in Sector B have water supply problems. According to municipal information provided, they all have, to date, water supply and sewage disposal service.
d) 1,579 homes in sectors C and D have incomplete infrastructure, streets full of craters, subsidence and do not have full public street lighting.
e) 3,742 homes and 5,000 residents without educational services, play areas, sports areas, gardens, as well as other basic services.
During the visit of Members of the Committee on Territorial Policy to the urbanization of Camposol we witnessed the regrettable state which it is in, as we will describe throughout this report.
f) None of these homes have a Licence of First-occupancy.
g) Many of these dwellings (724) were built by the promoter without works licences.
For several months the Committee on Territorial Policy has prepared an important research project with the aim of clarifying the most relevant facts regarding the Camposol urbanization. Citizens have a right to know what happened, who made the decisions, what were the motivations to make such important decisions, or lack of these, what the consequences of those decisions are and especially the possible solutions to these serious problems and measures that can avoid the repeating of a similar situation in our Region.
To this end this Report was constituted to begin its operation on the 28th October 2015. Since then there have been numerous and enlightening appearances and reports that have been ascribed to many agencies, including a physical visit to the urbanization in the Municipality of Mazarrón.
To know what really happened, accounts were needed by the individuals who were present at the time and had first-hand knowledge of the decision making, to this end, in-depth interviews have been conducted, although it would have been of great significance the appearance of the Promoter, of the technicians of the Promoter and the direct responsible for the various participating administrations at the final time of the issuing of the works-file.
Finally, a wide research work that is going to support the achievement of the initial objective, determine what happened in the approval of planning and construction of the Camposol urbanization, for the citizenships knowledge and for the achievement of viable solutions.
In addition to visiting the urbanization and the subsequent detailed analysis of the documentation examined by the Commission, the following people have been called to testify:
10th May 2016
- Mrs Silvana Buxton, Vice-chairman of the CRA
8th March 2017
- Mr Marín Martinez, General Secretary for the Town Hall of Mazarrón
- Mr Segado Casellas, Municipal Technician for the Town Hall of Mazarrón
15th March 2017
- Mrs Ros McDonell, Technician responsible for the Information System in the Public Works and Territorial Planning Department
23rd May 2017
- Mr Senín Álvarez, Municipal Arquitect for the Town Hall of Mazarrón
6th November 2017
- Mr Manuel Aldeguer Sánchez, Director General of Waters for the Valencia Region (CHS Water Delegate between 2004 and 2012)
- Mr D. Francisco Blaya Blaya, ex-mayor of Mazarrón (Mazarrón Mayor between 2003 and 2011)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION, REPORTS and FUNDAMENTALS
BACKGROUND
The General Plan of Mazarrón was definitively approved by order of the Councillor responsible for the Region of Murcia on May 9, 1991, collecting information until May 24, 1994.
The PAU (program of Urban Planning) of El Saladillo and the Plan Parcial of Sector A were put through at the same time and were initially approved on the 2nd July 1992, and provisionally approved on the 8th October 1992 – both approvals were agreed at the Pleno of the Town Council of Mazarrón – and definitely approved via the Order of the Department of Territorial Policy and Public Works of 12th March 1992.
The Compensation Project of Sector A, as well as the Urbanization Project, was approved by agreement at the Pleno of 31st January 1995.
The Partial Plan of the sector provided for in respect to endowments 249.780 m², and for the general system of free spaces 114,000 m²; although it seems to be that part of the assignment of System Gral. of free spaces was relocated to Sector BCDF. However, the compensation project that has to make effective the determinations of the Partial Plan provides for grants 106.450 m² - which means a deficit of 143.330 m² - and for the general system of free spaces 111.508 m² - which means a deficit of 2.492 m² - and all this in the land that had to be handed over to Mazarrón Council to be deemed public.
The Plan Parcial "El Saladillo" of the sectors B, C, D and F was definitively approved by agreement by the Pleno of Mazarrón Council in session held on January 25, 2000, by publicizing this definitive approval in the BORM number 200 of date 29 of August of 2001.
The urbanization project of Sector B, C, D and F was approved by agreement of the governing Committee in session held on 29 October 2000, and was published in BORM No. 285 dated 11 December 2001.
The Draft Compensation (replotting) was approved by Decree of the Mayor dated 13 July 2001, Number of Decree 783/01 and published in the BORM. This project was recorded in a public deed of formalisation of the project for the compensation of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo corresponding to the sectors B,C,D and F, before a notary of Mazarrón, Mr Eduardo-José Delgado Terrón. In the process of the compensation project, the final approval was used to annul the acquisition of the cessions by the developer, while maintaining the cessions in favour of the administration
In Sector B, C, D and F, the Plan Parcial covers an area of 5,042,473 m², while the compensation project that develops and executes it covers an area of 4,671,527.90 m² – which implies a deficit of 370,945.10 m²-, but even analysing the Compensation project in isolation, 8% of the surface area – equivalent to 350,000 m² – is not included in the general breakdown, although it is envisaged in the general breakdown of the awarded areas.
On March 22, 2004, Daniel Bascuñana Galiano, representing Justo y Manoli, SL, presented draft modification Nº1 consolidating the Plan Parcial of Sector B, C, D and F, of the area A-05-07 of the PGOU of Mazarrón (El Saladillo). After several opposing objections, on June 29, 2004 at the behest of the Company Justo y Manoli, SL punctual modification Nº1 began and consolidation of PAU A-05-07 of the PGOU of Mazarrón including punctual modification Nº1 and consolidation of the Plan Parcial for Sectors B, C, D. as it appears in a report of the municipal technician
During the modification of the planning referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura initiated an infringement file INF-422/2004 against the Promoter Justo and Manoli, SL in connection with the channelling of the Rambla de Los Aznares without authorization of the Authority, using 3 tubes of 1,200 mm in diameter and an approximate length of 1,500 meters under Sector D of the Plan Parcial. This sector was, at the time of the initiation, already urbanized and with houses in process of construction. In this orthophoto (aerial photo) from the year 1981 by Cartomur, the riverbed of the Rambla is perfectly visible.
It also contains a report issued in dossier (INF-422/2004) dated 11 March 2005 which gives rise to the initiation of a second dossier, which was instructed under the reference D-89/2005 and whose aim is to punish the conduct constituting a breach of the provisions of articles 77 and 116.3.d) of the Consolidated Text of the Law of Waters.
In this dossier, there was issued the corresponding order of restoration of the Public Hydraulic Domain (DHP – Public Property) affected by the pipeline works, this restoration must be carried out by the trading company Justo y Manoli SL, a fine of 1,200 euros was imposed.
The Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura (CHS) issued a subsidiary execution on May 31, 2006, which was appealed by the Company Justo y Manoli, SL, and was resolved by the sentence N º 903/2012 of the TSJ (Supreme Court) of Murcia of 26 October 2012, in a manner favourable to the interests of CHS.
In the year 2010 there were several sentences by the TSJ in relation to penalties imposed by Mazarrón Town Council on the Promoter Justo y Manoli, SL for the building of houses without the corresponding licence of works: 439/2010 for the construction of 112 Housing, 447/2010 for the construction of 277 homes, 468/2010 for the construction of 93 homes, 476/2010 for the construction of 130 homes and 464/2010 for the construction of 112 homes.
On April 15, 2011 The Local Government Board agreed to dispossess the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL, of its status as Developer agent and terminate the compensation system, ending or resolving the legal relationship between the administration (Council) and the Developer, as a consequence of the serious breaches of this Company in relation to its obligation to carry out the urbanization works of sectors A and BCDF, of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo. the Town of Mazarrón assumed the role of Developer, as this is in the public sphere of action it could not be neglected.
On August 22, 2014, the Local Government board agreed to the adoption by the Town Council of Mazarrón of the works of urbanization executed in the Plan Parcial El Saladillo, understanding the agreements of the Local Government Council of April 15, 2011, which dispossessed Justo and Manoli, SL, of its condition of developer, resulting the adoption by Mazarrón Town Council of the urbanization works executed in the Plan Parcial El Saladillo. However, it is recorded in the file of the Agreement report by the General Secretary of the Mazarrón Council, D. Juan Francisco Marín Martínez that there was disagreement with this decision.
In 2015 the Company Justo y Manoli, SL applied for regular voluntary liquidation, Auren Concursal SLP. being appointed as bankruptcy administrator. At the time of writing this report, the Company Justo y Manoli, SL is in the process of winding up with an asset valuation of 42,694,047.50 euros and debts listed at 108,964,584.01 euros.
On 20 February 2015 the Local Board of Government agreed to the formulation of the document progressing change in the land-use plan No. 76 of Mazarron area A-05-07 El Saladillo. On 15 May 2015, the Town Hall of the Municipality of Mazarrón agrees:
a) to pass and record the processing of amendment no.1 of the PAU (Programa de Actuación Urbanística - Urban Development Program) initially approved by the Municipal Council dated 16/7/2004, as well as the amendment of the Plan Parcial of sectors B,C,D and F. since this was not adapted to the LOTURM
b) to submit for public information the progress document of specific amendments to the PGOU de Mazarrón, Area 05-07 El Saladillo for a period of one month.
On 23 June 2015 the Commissioner of Waters for the CHS agreed to the instigation of the penalties procedure D-230/2015. The file instigated against the Company Justo y Manoli SL and against the Town Hall of Mazarrón for the commission of an offence consisting of the occupation of public property, being the Public Waterway Domain in the rambla de los Aznares including the urbanisation works referred to in the partial modification and consolidated program of Town Planning Action of the area A-05-07 El Saladillo of the PGOU of Mazarrón and modification Nº1 and consolidation of the Plan Parcial B, C, D and F El Saladillo, without the mandatory administrative authorisation, according to the service report indicating the performance of channelling dated 29 of May of 2015.
This file resulted with the imposition of a joint penalty against the Company Justo y Manoli, SL and Mazarrón Town Hall for an amount of 1 million euros. The restoration of the land was ordered to its previous state or the adoption of an equivalent technical solution duly authorized by the CHS, within two months (that to today still has not been resolved by the CHS), with the warning that failure to do so by the deadline would incur, at their own expense, the implementation of further measures, through enforcement and imposition on both for the payment of 7,894,251.75 euros in damages to the public domain. This file expired before it was ratified by the Council of Ministers.
In April 2017, CHS relaunched a sanctions file against Mazarrón Town Hall and the promoter Justo y Manolí, SL, which on this occasion if it reaches the Council of Ministers on October 20, 2017, will impose a joint sanction of 1 million euros and Compensation for damages caused to the public terrain amounting to 3,569,239 euros.
In May 2017 Mazarrón Town Council presented to the CHS a "study of alternatives for the channelling of the Rambla de los Aznares in its passage through the Camposol urbanization", written by Mr Diego Hernández Gil.
REPORTS
On 8 July 1999, the Regional Director General of planning and housing management, Mr. Rafael Amat Tuduri, issued a mandatory and binding report on the approval of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo, Sectors B, C, D and F, area A-05-07. In this report (not copied because of its protracted nature) multiple deficiencies are detailed.
The Director General for planning and housing did not report again about the processing of the aforementioned dossier. Although there is evidence that on 27 June 2001 he received the consolidated text of the Plan Parcial.
On 2 December 1999, the promoter presented a letter to Mazarrón Town Hall covering "corrections for compliance with what is indicated in connection with the Plan Parcial of sector B,C,D and F of the area to-05-07 of the General Plan of Mazarrón”.
On January 3, 2000, the municipal architect, D. Antonio Martínez Giménez reports that with respect to the Plan Parcial of Sector B, C, D and F of El Saladillo, new documentation has been presented correcting the reservations indicated in the reports of the Director General of Planning and housing, with the proviso that some details must be corrected.
On January 25, 2000, the (Mazarrón) Council Pleno in regular session unanimously approved this Plan Parcial.
On 20 January 2000, in a meeting of the Town Planning Committee was held prior to approval by the Plenary, during the debate the following interventions were observed:
Mr. Ruiz Cabrera warns that a report should be made about the urbanization, which is to be approved.
Mr. Juan José Lardín, replied that a few days previously the Architect and the Councillor for Services reviewed the urbanization and corrected a series of flaws.
The Municipal Architect. Mr Antonio Martínez Giménez, said that there were shortcomings in the provision of garden areas. This would now need to be revisited. In regard to the electrification he said that the municipality does not have the technicians.
Mr Adrián Jorquera, spokesperson for the PP, indicated that it would be necessary to carry out exhaustive control over the macro urbanization and that if we must attend once a week, then we should do that.
To this day, not since the year 2001, has the Town Council of Mazarrón accepted a provisional reception/adoption of the works of urbanization related to the water networks, sewerage and treatment plants of Sector A, but to the single effects of being able to allow individuals the Services of potable water, sewage and purification and with the commitment of the developer, Justo y Manoli, S.L., to rectify the deficiencies existing in such works and with warning of the guarantee in the amount of 6,290,000 Ptas, if, on 28 February 2002, those deficiencies were not corrected.
There is no evidence of the deficiencies being corrected, nor was the endorsement executed. The partial and provisional reception was carried out in order to be able to contract the services related to water networks, sewerage and sewage treatment plants. That is to say, for services directly aimed at putting houses into use, even though the technical report was very clear that the urbanization was not completed and what had been provisionally received was defective.
In the knowledge of the state of execution of the works of urbanization, nothing was done to solve it at that time (year 2001-2002). Nor later, as it was. Thus, in the report issued by the technical services of the Town Council of Mazarrón on March 5, 2003, there are several deficiencies in the urbanization works of Sector A, such as lack of execution of green areas, paving, streetlights, urban furniture Parking areas, or absence of various control tests of quality and compaction, among others.
Two years later, on 7 April 2005, a report was reissued by the municipal technical services, reiterating some of the deficiencies noted, along with some others.
Again, in September 2006, at the request of the developer to recognise an unspoken reception of the urbanization, it was reiterated that there were multiple deficiencies affecting these works. Thus we arrived at February 1, 2007 when the promoter, Justo y Manoli, S.L. is required, to proceed immediately to rectify the deficiencies found, as well as to provide the documentation that had been required of them. The promoter fulfilled neither requirement, nor did Mazarrón Council verify they were fulfilled.
On May 3, 2004, the Municipal Technician Ms. Agustina Alcázar García issued a report at the request of the Town Planning service on the Camposol urbanization Polígono A, Sector B, C, D and F, on inspection visits to this Urbanization covering 20 to 26 November 2003, she reported:
a) The works executed and those reflected in the urbanization project, do not coincide.
b) The path of the roads and of the roundabouts, do not coincide as shown in attached plan.
c) The Rambla de Los Aznares has been channelled, without being included in the urbanization project, and without the corresponding authorization of the Hydrographic Confederation.
d) The initial position of the bridge over the Rambla, which joins sector B, with the CDF has been altered, as well as new roundabouts and new roads being included, which affect the Pol. B, which is undeveloped. On the other side of the Rambla the situation of C-10 and C-7 has changed. A road has been run in the Pol. b area, linking B-15 and B-22, with B-5.
e) In the Pol. B-5, the road that runs parallel to the road MU-603, has no continuity with the main avenue, as shown in plan of the PP and the Urbanization project. The plots of B-5 (434-440) have no vehicle access and the road is 1.50 m wide.
f) The situation of the transformation centres of the urbanization project does not coincide with the PP. On site some have been executed in R.U. (Urban Residential) Zones.
g) Roads widths fail to comply.
h) The road has been modified in the area of the apartments H, changing the situation of the Golf Club House (which is operating without a works or opening licence)
i) There are roundabouts in the D-20 and D-19 areas which have not been executed.
On July 7, 2004, the Municipal Architect Juan A. Senín Álvarez issued a Report on the modification Nº1 consolidating the Plan Parcial of Sector B, C, D and F in the area A-05-07 of the PGOU El Saladillo de Mazarrón, in which it indicates:
a) With regard to the modification of the path of the principal roadway, according to the document, which is prompted by a supposed report by the CHS, obliges the promoter to change the situation of the bridge planned to cross the Rambla de Las Moreras. But this report, which is mentioned as an annex in the record of the documentation presented, does not actually appear in it.
b) The Municipal Technical Services have verified that the documents are part of the Plan Parcial and it is indeed verified that variations are occurring with respect to the approved documentation that implies an increase of building capacity on the maximum permissible on the PAU.
c) From the technical point of view, the new documentation now provided with the aim of rectifying the deficiencies observed in the original document, is already notarised in the technical report made in this regard by the Municipal Technician Ms. Agustina Garcia Alcazar.
d) The plan 2.7 Subdivision of poligonos, reflects part of the overall system known as F corresponding to the sector B,C,D and F as included in the poligono B which does not match the document of division of poligonos that the Town Hall approved at the time.
On February 28th, 2005, the CHS issue a report with respect to the administrative procedure INF-422/2004, in relation to the Rambla de Los Aznares in which it stated, without any doubt, that on the part of the Company Justo y Manolí, SL has implemented the channelling of the same, using 3 tubes of 1,200 mm diameter and approximate length of 1,500 metres under sector D, of the Plan Parcial. This sector was already urbanized with housing in the process of construction at the date of the drafting of the report.
It also contains a report issued by the CHS dated 11 March 2005 which gives rise to the initiation of the second dossier, which was instructed under the reference D-89/2005 and whose object is to penalise the alleged conduct, constituting infringement of the provisions of articles 77 and 116.3.d of the Consolidated Text of the Law of Waters.
The resolution of the file D-89/2005 by the CHS was appealed to the TSJ of Murcia by the company Justo y Manoli, SL and resolved by means of the sentence N º 903/2012 of the TSJ of Murcia of 26 of October of 2012.
Also included in the dossier is the report signed by Garrigues lawyers and tax advisors registered at Mazarrón Town Hall on 18 November 2008, No. 24451.
On 15 September 2010, the Engineer of Public Works, D José Antonio Selgado Casellas, issued a report on his visits to the urbanization works in the month of August 2010, he recounts a multitude of deficiencies relating to roads and pavements; referring to the fact that the road infrastructure executed does not agreed with that planned; the existence of new roads not reflected in the approved project; lack of signals, lighting, sidewalks, surface layer; Whole roads completely collapsed impeding road traffic and access to housing; the existing asphalt shows symptoms of major fatigue, cracked and broken at many points, with cavities of large dimensions; The approved project does not reflect any storm water network; etc. He ends by warning that the current situation could cause serious safety problems for the users of the area.
On December 28, 2010, the Ombudsman, Mr. José Pablo Ruiz Abellán, issued a report in reply to repeated complaints of residents to his office. Stating that Mazarrón Town Hall has an obligation to control the correct implementation of planning, ensuring that the urbanization is planned and executed correctly. Adding, that it is not relieved of compliance by the fact of making continuous requirements of correction in the works of the urbanization to the development company, letting time elapse without advancement, which would incur liability for any omission of the exercise of its powers and obligations.
On 11, 18 and 19 January 2011, new reports were issued by the Municipal Industrial Engineer, the Public Works Technical Engineer and the Municipal Health and Environmental Officer. They reiterate the serious breaches of the company Justo y Manolí, SL. Among these, the discharge of untreated wastewater into the Rambla of Los Tollos and the Rambla de Las Moreras.
On January 25, 2011, the legal advisor for Mazarrón Council, Mr. Ricardo Fernández Puche, issued a report in which he concluded that given the seriousness of the breaches by the promoter Justo y Manolí, SL, the following should be agreed:
a) Seize the guarantees deposited by the Company to guarantee the fulfilment of the development.
b) Dispossess the Company of its status as urban developer.
c) To desist from executing the Plan through the compensation system.
On January 27, 2011, the treasurer designate, Mr. Juan Martínez Sánchez, issued a report in relation to the bonds deposited in the Municipality of Mazarrón as collateral for the execution of the urbanization works corresponding to the said urban action. Specifically, a guarantee lodged with the Banesto Bank for the amount of 390,505.21 euros on 4/4/2007 and another, also with the Banesto Bank, amounting to 756,643 euros on 12/01/2006. It did not proceed to seize the guarantees until November, 2016, when the Company was already in full process of bankruptcy. The claim for the seizure of the guarantees is in the Contentious Administrative Court since they have denounced that the return should not proceed, as the company is in liquidation and as the treasurer of the guarantee is Santander Bank.
In May 2015, the company Actividad de Consultoría, Ingeniería y Medio Ambiente SL, (Activity of Consulting, Engineering and Environment SL), presented an initial strategic document for the ordinary strategic environmental assessment of the advance modification of the PGOU of Mazarrón, Area A-05-07 El Saladillo, in which it states: "It goes without saying that the persistence of the current situation (referring to the Rambla de Los Aznares), that barely allows the evacuation of half the foreseeable flow in the watercourse of T=100 years, implies a certain risk for property and people that we estimate unacceptable.
On May 14, 2015, the Head of the Urban Planning Services, Mr. Juan Antonio Senin Álvarez, issued a report in which he refers on several reports issued previously regarding this Plan Parcial, in particular to several reports issued as of November. of 2014 which stated that several unfavourable reports were issued in relation to area A-05-07, it is therefore understood that the licences in this urban area should be suspended while proceeding to solve the multiple deficiencies that were revealed in the reports.
On May 15, 2015, the Municipal Civil Engineer, Mr. Francisco Miguel García Pérez, issued a report in which he explained that the Los Aznares rambla was improperly channelled and totally inadequate as it passed through the urbanization. this has given rise to a situation not only irregular from the administrative point of view but also dangerous because there is a high risk of flooding in that area of the urbanization.
On May 18, 2015, the Municipal Environmental Technician, Mr. J. Manuel Fernández López issues a report regarding the progress of the modification of Mazarrón's PGOU No. 76 in which he says:
a) The use of the Environmental Impact Study Procedure to regularise what exists (referring to the PP El Saladillo) with that which does not coincide with the plans DOES NOT SEEM THE MOST ADEQUATE PROCEDURE, since it contravenes what is specified in article 2 of Law 21/2013 of environmental evaluation; how can we talk about preventive and precautionary action, when in reality 90% is already completed.
b) He recognizes the existence of discrepancies between the documented development and the reality implemented; But, who allowed and/or compromised the execution of works not contemplated in the planning documentation? How and in what way could unplanned realities be executed without any public administration detecting these deviations?
c) Currently 90% of the land of the El Saladillo modification is developed and consolidated. The environmental problems of the Camposol urbanization are already definitively established in its urban plot and are inseparable from the town model. But it is already irreversible and the process that has surprisingly started will not solve the problems of mobility and habitability that have caused a deep deterioration in some areas and a deficit of basic infrastructures that are affecting the quality of life of the residents of the area.
For her part, on September 25, 2015, the Regional Director General of Land Planning and Housing, Ms. Nuria Fuentes García-Lax issues a report in which she describes the Modification as STRUCTURAL, and included several objections, among them calling for an analysis of the obligations and rights in the field of all agencies involved.
In May 2017, Mazarrón Town Hall, in response to the sanctions ruling in D-230/2015 of the CHS, presented to this agency (CHS) a "Study of alternatives for the channelling of the Rambla de los Aznares as it passes through the Camposol development", written by the Technician D. Diego Hernández Gil.
This proposes three alternatives to the current route of the rambla, with the objective of complying with the second section of the resolution of the sanctioning file, in which the CHS orders the restoration of the land to its previous state or the adoption of an equivalent technical solution duly authorized by the waterways authority (CHS).
In a meeting with the Water Commissioner and the President of CHS and telephone conversations, the Agency informed the GPS that there is a consensus of agreement about one of these alternatives and that at the date of issuance of this report we have proof that there is authorization in part, by the CHS for its execution.
FUNDAMENTALS
We received a multitude of information regarding the urbanization Camposol (Plan Parcial El Saladillo). In the previous paragraphs (analysis and reports) we have referred only to what we have considered most important.
It is clear that everything that has had to do with this urbanization has been absolute nonsense from the beginning to the present day.
The Directorate General for Urban Planning of the Region of Murcia officially sent the PGOU document to the CHS on the 18th April 1991, requesting, being the sectorial administration the affected party, the appropriate mandatory report on the Ramblas of the municipality. The Directorate-General for Urban Planning requested said report from the CHS under the resolution of 17th October 1989 of the Ministry responsible, who required the mandatory and binding CHS report for the approval of the PGOU.
However, the CHS did not issue any report.
Likewise, on December 3rd 1992, the Directorate General of Urban Planning sent an official letter to the CHS in relation to the PAU and the first residential Plan Parcial of the Sector A 05-04 El Saladillo requesting information on the subject. Again, the CHS did not reply.
As for the approval of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo sectors B, C, D and F area A-05-07, again the CHS did not provide any information.
This means that the PGOU of Mazarrón, the Plan Partial El Saladillo Sector A, and the Plan Parcial El Saladillo sectors B; C; D and F were approved without the mandatory and binding reports from the CHS.
There are many Court sentences that declare null and void the controls of urban planning due to the lack of report from the Water Authority responsible, as referred to in the Law of Waters.
We analyzed carefully the interventions of the Commission of Urban Planning in the town hall of Mazarrón:
On the 20th January 2000, in the Committee on Urban Planning prior to the approval of the Plenary, the following interventions were observed during the debate:-
Mr. Ruiz Cabrera warns that a report should be made on the urbanization, but this is ignored.
Mr. Juan José Lardin, replies that a few days ago the Architect and the Councillor for Services inspected the urbanization and corrected a series of defects.
The Municipal Architect Mr. Antonio Martínez Giménez, said that there were deficiencies in the execution of gardening requirements. Another visit was required. As for electrical requirements, the City Council has no technicians.
Mr. Adrián Jorquera, spokesman for the Plan Parcial, indicates that it is necessary to carry out an exhaustive control of the macro urbanization, even if it means going on a weekly basis.
It is clear that when the Plan Parcial El Saladillo was definitively approved, the urbanization works were already very advanced. Again Mr. Ruiz Cabrera warned that a report should be made on the urbanization and Mr. Lardín admits that the urbanization works had been revised and a number of defects were corrected. The Municipal Architect shared these views.
For his part, Mr. Jorquera referred to the need to make a weekly visit to the urbanization works with the objective, it is supposed, to carry out a thorough control. However, his observation which he made at the Town Planning Commission on 20th January 2000, was not implemented.
It is clear that from the start the promoter acted as they pleased aided by the complacency of the City Council of Mazarrón. Within the information provided by the City Council of Mazarrón there are no other reports on the negligent activities in the urbanization works until the report of 3rd May 2004 from the municipal technician, Ms. Agustina Alcazar on the Camposol urbanization Poligono A, Sector B, C, D and F, regarding the inspection visits dated 20th to 26th November 2003 to said urbanization.
a) The executed works do not coincide with those reflected in the urbanization project.
b) Neither roads, nor roundabouts coincide with those marked in the associated plan.
c) The Rambla de Los Aznares has been channeled, without being included in the urbanization project, and without the corresponding authorization of the CHS.
d) The initial route of the bridge has been modified through the Rambla, which joins sector B to sectors CDF, as well as including new roundabouts and new roads, which affect the Poligono B, which is not developed. On the other side of the Rambla the situation of C-10 and C-7 has been modified. A road has been added in Poligono B, in the area which links B-15 and B-22 to B-5.
e) At Poligono B-5, the road that runs parallel to the road MU-603, has no continuity with the main avenue, as shown in plan of the Plan Parcial and in the Urbanization project. The plots of B-5 (434-440) have no vehicle access, the road is 1.50 m wide.
f) The situation of the Transformation Centers of the Urbanization Project does not coincide with the Plan Parcial. On site some have been executed in the R.U.(Urban Residential) Zone.
g) The width of the roads is not according to plan.
h) The road leading to the area of the H (Hotel) apartments has been modified, thus modifying the situation of the Golf Club House (which is running without works licence, or opening licence)
i) Several roundabouts have not been implemented in zones D-20 and D-19.
Since the beginning of the urbanization works in the Plan Parcial El Saladillo sector B, C, D and F in the year 2000-or before-, up until the visits that took place in November of 2003, there was no municipal supervision, and if there was any, the Town Hall of Mazarrón did not adopt any measure to correct the situation.
It seems that the existence of the aforementioned report forced the municipality of Mazarrón to take measures given the gravity of the facts. At that time, the City Council, far from sanctioning the promoter and demanding the restitution of the current legality opted for a modification of the Plan Parcial in order to adapt it to the works already executed.
This resulted in modification N º 1 of the Plan Parcial of Sector B, C, D and F El Saladillo, presented by the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL on March 22nd 2004 and that the Town Council of Mazarrón approved initially on July 16th 2004. This modification never came to be definitively approved, because the City Council cancelled its processing in May 2015.
The JGL (Local Government Committee meeting) of 16th July 2004 unanimously approved the modification of the Plan Parcial, after a declaration of urgency of the subject in question, despite the serious warnings made by municipal technicians on the development of the Plan Parcial originally approved and the absence of the report of the Secretary-General, Mr. Cristóbal Moya López.
It was precisely the processing of this modification N º 1 of the Plan Parcial that gave rise to the intervention of the CHS, which until the beginning of the year 2004 had not done so - there is a report of the City Council in reference to the issue dated April 22nd 2004. On February 28th 2005, the CHS issues a report regarding the administrative procedure INF-422/2004, in relation to the Rambla de Los Aznares, in which it states, without any doubt, that the Company Justo y Manolí, SL has implemented a channeling of the rambla using 3 tubes of 1,200mm diameter for an approximate length of 1500 meters under sector D of the Plan Parcial. This sector is already urbanized and with the houses under construction as of the date of writing the report.
The usual leadership of the CHS in its interventions of fluvial (waterway) police and occupation of the DPH (Waterways Public Property), in this case did not take place. It is incomprehensible that a rambla, in this case the Rambla de los Aznares, was channeled in a section of 1500m, crossing the Camposol urbanization between the years 2000 and November of 2003 and that the CHS did not prevented it.
In respect of the administrative file instructed by the CHS against the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL, INF-422/2004, the latter appeals against it, referring to a report sent by City Council of Mazarrón RS N º 7,467 of May 10th 2016 in relation to a previous one sent to the CHS in date 22nd April 2004 in which it is said: "Neither the PGOU of Mazarrón nor in the projects of the PAU and Plan Parcial originally approved any reference is made to the existence of this Rambla", that is, to the Rambla de los Aznares.
We already said that the PGOU of Mazarrón, PAU and Plan Parcial had been approved without the mandatory and binding report of the CHS, as required by the Law of Waters.
On the other hand, if we read carefully the report of the municipal technician of May 3rd 2004, in section (c) it says: "The Rambla de Los Aznares has been channelled, without being included in the urbanization project and without the corresponding authorization of the Confederación Hydrográfica ". In other words, the urbanization project did not include the channelling of the Rambla de Los Aznares.
On the other hand, it is surprising to see that the City Council of Mazarrón argues that the Rambla de Los Aznares does not appear in its planning controls, when in the allegation presented to the CHS on May 6th 2016 in connection with the opening of the sanctions file D-230/2015, they include an aerial photo dated 1981 on the delimitation of the riverbed of the Rambla de Los Aznares, according to the urban visual display Cartomur.
Furthermore the Deputy Commissioner of the CHS, Mr. José García Rodríguez, in a report issued on 11th March 2005, says. "There is no doubt, therefore, that this is a public riverbed", providing a cadastral certification issued by the Cadastral Management Center of Murcia.
Finally, the argument put forward in relation of their ignorance of the fact that the Rambla de Los Aznares was a public riverbed does not justify the channelling of this Rambla without the mandatory authorization of the CHS, as demonstrated in the sentence N º 903/2012 of TSJ (Tribunal Supremo de Justicia) de Murcia, October 26th 2012.
T
he successful appeal presented by the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL to the Contentious-Administrative Court TSJ of Murcia 824/2007, for the provisional suspension (order 824/2007) of the resolution of the CHS sanctioning dossier D-89/2005 for the restoration order of the DPH and the penalty of 1,200 euros; as well as the subsidiary execution order issued by the CHS in May 31st 2006 for the restoration of the DPH to its previous state, paralyzed the CHS resolutions until October 26th 2012 when the Tribunal rejects the contentious administrative appeal brought by the Mercantile Justo y Manoli, SL.
A further consequence of the Tribunal decision to preventatively suspend the CHS agreements was the blocking of the modification N º 1 of the Plan Parcial Sector B, C, D, and F El Saladillo put forward by the Town Council of Mazarrón.
The one who was not blocked was the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL who continued to build undisturbed without the slightest municipal control, despite reports that warned of irregularities as signed by the Firm Garrigues Lawyers and Tax Advisors registered at the Town Council of Mazarrón in date November 18th 2008, N º 24451.
We have already referred to the different rulings of the TSJ - in the ‘previous history’ section - in which the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL is sentenced to pay the penalties interposed by the Town Council of Mazarrón for the illegal construction of houses. In effect 5 sentences were passed for the illegal construction of 724 houses, some of them in the riverbed of the Rambla de Los Aznares. In total, the promoter is sentenced to pay the Town Council more than 3.6 million euros.
Although the Town Council of Mazarrón instigated the imposition of penalties on the promoter for the construction of unlicensed homes, it did not seek the payment of these sentences. Our records show that the Town Council of Mazarrón did not receive any of these payments, nor did they register on the List of Creditors of the mercantile Justo y Manoli, SL to claim these fines from the Bankruptcy Administration.
In the year 2009, the Town Council of Mazarrón declares in file number 121/2009 (archived by expiration) that the commercial developer has systematically failed to comply with the stages envisaged in the urbanization project. Likewise, the reports certify that some of the works executed by the developer do not conform to the approved urbanization project or contain numerous deficiencies. In short, neither the urbanization works envisaged for each stage have been completed, nor the works that have been executed are in a minimum acceptable condition for their formal adoption by the administration.
In October of the year 2010, more than six years after the accumulation of irregularities came to light, the Town Council of Mazarrón acknowledges a new report dated September 15th 2010 issued by the Technical Engineer of Public Works, Mr. José Antonio Mowed Casella who states that the irregularities detected by the municipal technician in her inspections of November 2003 have increased in number, warning that "the current situation can cause serious safety problems for users in the area." As a result the Town Council decides to initiate proceedings for the execution of bonds deposited by Justo and Manolí, SL, as guarantee of the execution of the works of urbanization.
On January 11th 2011, the municipal technician responsible for health and environment, reports on the status of wastewater pumping, concluding that all of the pumps are discharging untreated waste water into the Rambla de los Tollos and the Rambla de las Moreras. He recommended that his report be forwarded to the CHS as this breached the Law of Waters.
On January 18th 2011, the municipal technical engineer also issues a report on the state of public lighting, concluding that the supplying Company is not providing electrical power for street lighting and that the installations have serious deficiencies
On January 19th 2011, the technical Engineer of public works, Mr. José Antonio Segado Casellas re-submits the deficiencies already reported in his report of September 2010.
On the basis of all this, the Local Government Committee held a meeting on January 28th 2011 and agreed to initiate the procedure to dispossess the Company of its status as a developer and discontinue executing the Plan Parcial by the compensation system. It is also agreed to carry out an economic evaluation of the urbanization works still outstanding in order to evaluate the amounts deposited as collateral by the developer; If these prove insufficient the definitive agreement of compensation according to article 178 of the Regulation of urban management will have to be implemented. This procedure concludes with the agreement of the JGL of April 15th 2011 in which the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL was deprived of its status as a developer agent, as a consequence of the serious breaches of the Company in relation to its obligation to carry out the urbanization works of both sectors.
This Committee is not aware of the JGL implementing any of the agreements taken on 28th January 2011 in relation to the confiscation of the guarantees and of carrying out an economic evaluation of the urbanization works yet to be completed. This was confirmed by several of the witnesses.
On August 22nd 2014, following a proposal from the mayor's office, the JGL adopts the following agreements:
a) The agreements of the JGL of April 15th 2011, which dispossessed Justo and Manolí, SL of its condition of developer, produced the adoption by the Town Council of Mazarrón of the works of the urbanization executed in the Plan Parcial 1st phase (A 05 07) El Saladillo. This means that the Town Council shall undertake the completion of the outstanding urbanization works, the conservation and maintenance of existing ones and the provision of compulsory public services for the supply of drinking water and Sewage system, road cleaning, collection of household waste and street lighting.
This agreement was approved as a result of the Mayor's casting vote, as three members of the JGL voted in favour and three others against it.
In his report, the secretary General of the Town Council, Mr Juan Francisco Marín Martínez, concludes that:
a) The urbanization Camposol is adopted by the Town Council of Mazarrón under the agreements adopted by the JGL in date 15th April 2011
b) In order to comply with the JGL agreements dated 15th April 2011 and to adopt an agreement with sufficient guarantees, I believe that the dossiers for the implementation of the guarantees should be completed, and the updated version of the appropriate technical reports be obtained.
It is clear that the Secretary General did not share the agreement adopted by the JGL and expressed it clearly in his appearance before this Committee where he stated that he understood that there is no such tacit adoption of the urbanization works by the Town Council of Mazarrón .
On February 20th 2015, the JGL of the Town Council of Mazarrón agrees to initiate modification no. 76 of the PGOU of Mazarrón, referring to the Plan Parcial Sector B, C, D and F of the area A-05-07 El Saladillo.
In May 2015, the company Actividad de Consultoria, Ingenieria y Medio Ambiente SL, presents a first strategic document for the common strategic environmental evaluation of the summary of punctual modification of the PGOU of Mazarrón, area A-05-07 El Saladillo, in which is said:
"It goes without saying that the persistence of the current situation (referring to the Rambla de Los Aznares) which barely allows the evacuation of half the predictable flow in the avenue of T = 100 years, implies a certain risk for property and people which we consider unacceptable.
It is clear that this report is influenced by the events that occurred in the flood of 25th September 2014, which put at risk the lives of the inhabitants of the urbanization of Camposol.
The approval phase of the summary resulted in different reports issued by the municipal technicians. Very significant is the one issued on the 18th May 2015, by the Municipal technician of Environment, Mr. J. Manuel Fernandez Lopez, with respect to the summary of the modification of the PGOU of Mazarrón N º 76 in which it says:
a) The procedure for the assessment of environmental impact to regularize that reality (referring to the Plan Parcial El Saladillo) which does not coincide with what is planned does not seem the most appropriate procedure, since it contravenes article 2 of The Environmental Assessment Act 21/2013; how can preventive and precautionary action be considered, when the reality is 90% completed.
b) The existence of discrepancies between the development controls and the implemented reality is acknowledged; but who allowed and/or compromised the execution of works not envisaged in the planning controls? how and in what form could unplanned realities be executed without any public administration detecting these deviations?
c) At present 90% of the land in the modification of El Saladillo is developed and consolidated. The environmental problems of the urbanization Camposol are definitively ingrained in its urban condition and are inherent to its model of a town. This is irreversible and the process that surprisingly is started is not going to solve the problems of mobility and habitability that have caused great deterioration in some areas and a deficit of basic infrastructures that are affecting the quality of life of the residents of the area.
These are the key questions to be answered. It is the opinion of the Socialist Parliamentary Group that there is a clear political responsibility in all areas of administration, local, regional and central (CHS), in some cases by action and in others by omission.
It would never have been possible to carry out works of this magnitude for so many years, with such a level of irregularities and illegalities without the complicity of action or omission of the three administrations.
It is clear that the main responsible is the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL, but also that they have operated under the umbrella of the administration. Otherwise it would have been impossible to develop the urbanization of Camposol in its Sector B, C, D and F within the approved terms and according to the legal requirements in force.
Evidence shows that the Central administration, represented by the CHS has failed in its functions to protect the DPH. There is evidence that the Directorate General of Urban Planning requested reports to the CHS for the approval of the PGOU of the Town Council of Mazarrón and for the approval of the PAU and the Plan Parcial El Saladillo, and that such reports were not issued.
The Rambla de Los Aznares was channelled, between the years 2000 and November of 2003, and some 550 houses were built above and in the delimitation zone of the riverbed without any intervention, until the Town Council of Mazarrón forwarded, as evidence, the modification N º 1 of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo Sector B, C, D and F.
Since the sentence N º 903/2012 of the TSJ of Murcia of 26th October 2012, the subsidiary execution to restore the riverbed to its original state has not taken place. The only instruction consisted in a sanctioning file reference D-230/2015 against the Promoter Justo y Manolí, SL and the Town Council of Mazarrón dated 23rd June 2015, imposing a sanction of 1 million euros and compensation for damage to the Public Domain of 7,894,251.75 euros, forcing the restitution of the DPH or the adoption of the equivalent technical solution authorized by the CHS within a period of two months and warning that the subsidiary execution will be applied if this time limit is not adhered-to. This file expired before it was ratified by the Council of Ministers. Subsequently the CHS, in April 2017, again opened a sanctioning file which in this case was ratified by the Council of Ministers imposing a sanction of 1 million euros and a compensation for damages caused to the public riverbed of 3,569,239 euros to the Town Council of Mazarrón and the promoter. Likewise, the restitution of the DPH or the adoption of the equivalent technical solution authorized by the CHS within a period of two months and warning that the subsidiary execution will be applied if this time limit is not adhered-to.
The provisional suspension passed by the TSJ order 824/2007 against the resolution of the sanctioning dossier of the CHS D-89/2005, suspended the penalty imposed on the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL and the subsidiary execution agreed by the CHS. However the order of the TSJ also prevented the continuation of the works on the riverbed of the Rambla de Los Aznares. The CHS justifies the opening of the sanctioning dossier D-230/2015 stating that the facts denounced are different from those that instigated file D-89/2005 by which the promoter Justo y Manolí, SL was punished, arguing that these are different works in infringing continuity. In other words, what the CHS is recognizing is that despite the fact that the TSJ ordered the halting of the works on the riverbed of the Rambla on the 21st January 2008, these continued - which is evident if the photographic reports of the time and the current situation are compared - without the Intervention of either the Town Council of Mazarrón or the CHS, since they both failed to exercise their responsibility to prevent it.
At this point it may be worth remembering the floods that occurred in the urbanization of Camposol, on September 25th 2015, due to the negligent performance of the administration allowing the illegal channelling of the Rambla de los Aznares.
The Regional Administration should never have approved the PGOU of Mazarrón, nor the Plan Parcial El Saladillo in its sectors A and B, C, D and F without the mandatory and binding reports of the CHS. It should also have verified that in the consolidated text of the Plan Parcial Residencial El Saladillo Sector B, C, D and F, presented by the Town Council of Mazarrón the multitude of deficiencies included in their report of 8th July 1999, some of them extremely serious, had been rectified.
The CARM (Comunidad Autónoma Región de Murcia) intervened according to the dictates in article 280 of Law 13/2015 of 30th March, of territorial and urban planning of the region of Murcia and as established in its preceding articles, which state that if the urbanistic bodies of the Autonomous community are informed of the granting of a works license or execution order that constitutes an urban development infraction, they may instigate a review leading to a contesting action as per articles 65 and 66 of Law 7/1985 regulating the Bases of Local regime. If the Town Council does not proceed to the adoption and implementation of the previous agreements within two months of the effective requirement of the Director General responsible for urban planning, their municipal responsibility will be substituted for the appropriate implementation to take place. It is more than obvious that they had knowledge of the urban irregularities and also that in no case they acted.
The Town Council of Mazarrón has acted negligently in the supervision of the promoter of the urbanization Camposol. 550 houses suffered structural damage in sectors C and D due to the instability of the land generated by the channelling of the Rambla de los Aznares. It is the responsibility of the Town Council to ensure the proper execution of the planning controls and it is precisely the failure of carrying out this function that has led to the current situation. These are conclusions written by the CHS in its penalties files against the Town Council of Mazarrón.
For its part, the Ombudsman, in his report dated 28th December 2010 states that the Town Council of Mazarrón has an obligation to control the correct execution of the planning, ensuring that the urbanization works are planned and executed correctly. It adds, that the Town Council cannot exonerate itself from fulfilling these duties, simply by requiring continuously that the promoter rectify the works of the urbanization, allowing more time to elapse without further involvement, possibly incurring added responsibility for omitting to exercise their obligation.
For the GPS (Socialist Parliamentary Group PSOE) there is no doubt about the responsibilities of the Town Council of Mazarrón, although it is not our faculty to determine the nature of these responsibilities and who is in charge of executing them. This task will be undertaken on other occasions.
Conclusions
First
The PGOU of Mazarrón and the Plan Parcial El Saladillo Sector A and Sector B, C, D and F were approved without the reports of the CHS.
Second
The CARM (Murcia Regional Authority) did not check if in the Revised Text of the approval of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo Sector B, C, D, and F had addressed all the deficiencies reflected in the report of date 8th July 1999.
Third
The urbanization works of the Plan Parcial of Sector B, C, D, and F were started before the Plan Parcial was definitively approved.
Fourth
Already in the year 2000 the Commission for Town Planning of the Town Council of Mazarrón alerted that the urbanization works of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo Sector B, C, D and F were being executed irregularly.
Fifth
Between the year 2000 and November of the year 2003 the Promoter Justo y Manoli, SL executed the urbanization works without Municipal (Mazarrón Town Hall) supervision, nor the supervision of the CHS.
Sixth
The first Municipal report that warns of the serious irregularities in the development of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo Sector B, C, D and F is dated May 2004.
Seventh
The Rambla de Los Aznares was illegally channelled between the year 2000 and November of 2003 without the vigilance or supervision of both, the Town Council of Mazarrón and the CHS.
Eight
In order to resolve the serious irregularities in the development of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo Sector B, C, D and F, the Town Council of Mazarrón decides to modify the Plan Parcial to adapt it to the factual reality.
Ninth
The JGL (Governing Board) of the Town Council of Mazarrón initially approved the modification of the Plan Parcial El Saladillo Sector B, C, D and F, in spite of warnings from the municipal technicians on the irregularities detected in the development of the planning.
Tenth
At the end of the year 2003 there were several houses under construction in the riverbed and the delimitation area of the Rambla de Los Aznares.
Eleventh
The Rambla de Los Aznares was channelled by the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL, without being included in the urbanization project approved by the Town Council of Mazarrón in the year 2000.
Twelfth
An aerial photo of the year 1981 shows that the path of the riverbed of the Rambla de Los Aznares appears perfectly graphed in the cartography. in the Plan Parcial El Saladillo Sector B, C, D and F.
Thirteenth
A certificate from the Cadastral Management Centre certifies that the Rambla de Los Aznares belongs to the DPH of the Segura basin (CHS).
Fourteenth
The Promoter Justo y Manoli, SL. ignored the order of the TSJ (Murcia Supreme Court) of 2008 that prevented the construction on the riverbed and the delimitation area of the Rambla de Los aznares.
Fifteenth
In 2010 the TSJ sentenced the promoter Justo y Manoli, SL., to pay more than 3.6 million euros to the City Council of Mazarrón for the construction of 724 houses without municipal license of works.
Sixteenth
The Town Council of Mazarrón did not execute the sentences of the TSJ that sentenced the promoter to pay more than 3.6 million euros, nor communicated to the bankruptcy administration of the Company Justo Y Manoli, SL this credit to be part of the bankruptcy debts.
Seventeenth
The current situation of the urbanization can cause serious safety problems for the users of the area.
Eighteenth
The Town Council of
article_detail
Find more information by AREA, TOWN or URBANISATION .....
Cabo de Palos
Cartagena
El Carmoli
Islas Menores and Mar de Cristal
La Manga Club
La Manga del Mar Menor
La Puebla
La Torre Golf Resort
La Union
Los Alcazares
Los Belones
Los Nietos
Los Urrutias
Mar Menor Golf Resort
Pilar de la Horadada
Playa Honda / Playa Paraiso
Portman
Roldan and Lo Ferro
San Javier
San Pedro del Pinatar
Santa Rosalia Lake and Life resort
Terrazas de la Torre Golf Resort
Torre Pacheco
Cartagena
El Carmoli
Islas Menores and Mar de Cristal
La Manga Club
La Manga del Mar Menor
La Puebla
La Torre Golf Resort
La Union
Los Alcazares
Los Belones
Los Nietos
Los Urrutias
Mar Menor Golf Resort
Pilar de la Horadada
Playa Honda / Playa Paraiso
Portman
Roldan and Lo Ferro
San Javier
San Pedro del Pinatar
Santa Rosalia Lake and Life resort
Terrazas de la Torre Golf Resort
Torre Pacheco
Aguilas
Aledo
Alhama de Murcia
Bolnuevo
Camposol
Condado de Alhama
Fuente Alamo
Hacienda del Alamo Golf Resort
Lorca
Mazarron
Puerto de Mazarron
Puerto Lumbreras
Sierra Espuna
Totana
Aledo
Alhama de Murcia
Bolnuevo
Camposol
Condado de Alhama
Fuente Alamo
Hacienda del Alamo Golf Resort
Lorca
Mazarron
Puerto de Mazarron
Puerto Lumbreras
Sierra Espuna
Totana
Abanilla
Abaran
Alcantarilla
Archena
Blanca
Corvera
El Valle Golf Resort
Hacienda Riquelme Golf Resort
Lorqui
Molina de Segura
Mosa Trajectum
Murcia City
Peraleja Golf Resort
Ricote
Sucina
Abaran
Alcantarilla
Archena
Blanca
Corvera
El Valle Golf Resort
Hacienda Riquelme Golf Resort
Lorqui
Molina de Segura
Mosa Trajectum
Murcia City
Peraleja Golf Resort
Ricote
Sucina
Urbanisations
CamposolCondado de Alhama
El Valle Golf Resort
Hacienda del Alamo Golf Resort
Hacienda Riquelme Golf Resort
Islas Menores and Mar de Cristal
La Manga Club
La Torre Golf Resort
Mar Menor Golf Resort
Mazarron Country Club
Mosa Trajectum
Peraleja Golf Resort
Santa Rosalia Lake and Life resort
Terrazas de la Torre Golf Resort
La Zenia
Lomas de Cabo Roig
Important Topics:
CAMPOSOL TODAY Whats OnCartagena SpainCoronavirusCorvera Airport MurciaMurcia Gota Fria 2019Murcia property news generic threadWeekly Bulletin
CAMPOSOL TODAY Whats OnCartagena SpainCoronavirusCorvera Airport MurciaMurcia Gota Fria 2019Murcia property news generic threadWeekly Bulletin
Contact Murcia Today: Editorial 966 260 896 /
Office 968 018 268